Halting Proven Energy Technologies?
Jane Van Ryan
Posted July 29, 2009
In a recent Houston Chronicle op-ed, Richard Burleson, managing partner of Houston-based and energy-focused law firm Burleson Cooke L.L.P., cautions the administration and Congress against over-regulating hydraulic fracturing. As we've explained in this blog, hydraulic fracturing is a process where fluid is pumped under pressure down through the wellbore to make tiny fissures in the rock, allowing natural gas and oil to flow more easily up through the well.
According to Mr. Burleson, concerns about hydraulic fracturing on drinking water are misplaced:
"Hydraulic fracturing is safe, and there is no credible evidence to suggest otherwise...Fracing liquids are injected thousands of feet below the water table, and rock generally acts as a barrier to prevent any migration."
Mr. Burleson adds that the impact of over-regulating this proven practice would be particularly acute in Texas--the "epicenter of domestic exploration and production activity." If hydraulic fracturing were eliminated entirely, he says, Texas could lose millions in state tax and royalty revenues as well as up to 364,000 jobs. Furthermore, the state and the entire nation would suffer a steep decline in domestic energy production.
Read the full op-ed for more information.
About The Author
- Blogger Conference Call - Oil Sands Development and the Keystone XL
- Blogger Conference Call - ExxonMobil Earnings and Taxes
- Blogger Conference Call - Industry Earnings and Public Pension Plan Ownership
- ETR 130 - The Oil and Natural Gas Industry's Contribution to State Pension Plans
- Keystone Pipeline: The Sooner, the Better
- Capping Stack: A Positive Outcome from a Tragic Accident