The Case For Oil Sands
Jane Van Ryan
Posted July 31, 2009
In a recent op-ed in the Argus Leader, John Duff Erickson, professor emeritus at the South Dakota School of Mines and Technology, makes a strong case for continuing the development of Canadian oil sands. He notes that Canada is the largest supplier of oil to the United States, and Canadian oil is helping to bolster U.S. energy security.
Mr. Erickson also expresses his concern about a coalition's efforts to stop the use of oil sands-derived crude oil in the United States. He says the coalition is arguing that oil sands production is a leading cause of greenhouse gas emissions:
"It would be folly to halt oil sands production and the construction of pipelines that would carry Canadian oil to U.S. markets. Oil sands development accounts for less than 1 percent of global greenhouse-gas emissions. Environmental groups claim that oil sands produce five to seven times the carbon emissions of conventional oil, but a study by Cambridge Energy Research Associates, a highly regarded consulting group, determined that oil sands emissions are only 5 percent to 15 percent higher than the average barrel of crude oil processed in the United States."
Mr. Erickson adds that several refineries in the Upper Midwest are boosting their oil sands capacity and making large investments to increase operating efficiency and reduce emissions. Under the API Climate Action Challenge, API-member refiners have committed to improve their efficiency by 10 percent by 2012.
Read more about Canadian oil sands.
About The Author
- Blogger Conference Call - Oil Sands Development and the Keystone XL
- Blogger Conference Call - ExxonMobil Earnings and Taxes
- Blogger Conference Call - Industry Earnings and Public Pension Plan Ownership
- ETR 130 - The Oil and Natural Gas Industry's Contribution to State Pension Plans
- Keystone Pipeline: The Sooner, the Better
- Capping Stack: A Positive Outcome from a Tragic Accident