Kerry-Boxer Goes to the Floor
Jane Van Ryan
Posted November 5, 2009
The Senate Environment and Public Works Committee today voted to send the Kerry-Boxer climate bill to the Senate floor without amendments. Only Democrats were in attendance for the vote, and Sen. Max Baucus (D-Mt.) voted against the bill, saying he would withhold his support contingent on the adoption of some pro-agriculture amendments.
The Republican members of the committee have been boycotting the committee's hearings on the Kerry-Boxer bill, saying they wanted a full Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) analysis of the legislation rather than the regurgitated analysis of the Waxman-Markey bill that was provided to the committee. Today, committee chairwoman Sen. Barbara Boxer (D-Calif.)rebuffed their request, saying it would be duplicative and a "waste of taxpayer money" to prepare a new analysis.
In the past, the committee refrained from voting when fewer than two members of the minority party (Republicans) were not present. Today's action appeared to be a clear departure from the committee's own rules and from the spirit of bipartisanship.
API's President Jack Gerard said in a statement:
"Today's action should mark the end of Kerry-Boxer, Waxman-Markey-style legislation that could destroy millions of American jobs and drive up fuel prices, punishing everyone who drives, flies or takes a bus or train...Congress now has the opportunity to develop a meaningful, bipartisan energy and climate policy that addresses the challenges at hand without holding back our nation's economic recovery."
Kevin Book of Clear View Energy Partners, LLC, who has been following the climate legislation closely, says today's vote shows that the Democrats are very serious about arriving at some agreement on climate before the Copenhagen meeting in 32 days. He also says it "increases the importance of support by farm-state Senators...whose home states could derive economic upside by originating offset credits."
Republicans are warning that today's committee vote was a "nuclear" option, meaning that it might have destroyed all hope for bipartisan consensus. But, as Kevin says, that point could be moot because Democrats control the committee and the Senate.
About The Author
- Blogger Conference Call - Oil Sands Development and the Keystone XL
- Blogger Conference Call - ExxonMobil Earnings and Taxes
- Blogger Conference Call - Industry Earnings and Public Pension Plan Ownership
- ETR 130 - The Oil and Natural Gas Industry's Contribution to State Pension Plans
- Keystone Pipeline: The Sooner, the Better
- Capping Stack: A Positive Outcome from a Tragic Accident
- climate bill
- climate legislation
- domestic energy
- energy policy
- Jack Gerard
- senate environment and public works committee
Stay informed: Sign-up for our weekly newsletter