Rejecting the National Interest
Posted January 18, 2012
I just read the best argument for the Keystone XL pipeline this morning:
“… the addition of crude oil pipeline capacity between Canada and the United States will advance a number of strategic interests of the United States. These included increasing the diversity of available supplies among the United States’ worldwide crude oil sources in a time of considerable political tension in other major oil producing countries and regions; shortening the transportation pathway for crude oil supplies; and increasing crude oil supplies from a major non-Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries producer.
Canada is a stable and reliable ally and trading partner of the United States, with which we have free trade agreements which augment the security of this energy supply. Approval of the permit sends a positive economic signal, in a difficult economic period, about the future reliability and availability of a portion of United States’ energy imports, and in the immediate term, this shovel-ready project will provide construction jobs for workers in the United States.”
That is from the State Department approval of the Alberta Clipper Pipeline in 2009, but describes the benefits of the Keystone XL pipeline from Canada to a T: diversifying supplies, shortening transportation paths, increasing supplies from a stable and reliable ally, sending a positive economic signal, and shovel-ready construction jobs.
And yet, as we have just learned, the President has decided not to approve the Keystone XL pipeline, caving to political threats from a small number of misguided activists.
As former Obama U.S. National Security advisor Gen. Jim Jones put it last month:
“If we get to the point where we cannot bring ourselves to do what is in our national interest, then we are clearly in a period of decline, in terms of our global leadership and our ability to compete.”
The President has brought us to that point, the question now is: where do we go from here? Here is Jack Gerard’s vision from the State of American Energy event a few weeks ago:
“We are on the wrong track. Even the status quo will not be enough. So let’s change course. Let’s take advantage of the many opportunities we have to determine our energy future. It’s a future based on increased self-sufficiency and enhanced energy and national security through greater access to domestic resources. We can safely and responsibly produce more of the energy Americans want and need through our own significant supplies of oil and natural gas.
The right track means more domestic energy of all types, including renewable energy, increased efficiency and promoting other environmentally-friendly options, including next generation technologies to reduce our carbon footprint…Over the course of our history, Americans have refused to settle for less. And we don’t have to settle for less now. We have the resources to meet our energy challenges. With the right leadership and vision, we can turn our challenges into opportunities that will make our country stronger.”
It’s time to get back on track.
About The Author
Mark Green joined API after a career in newspaper journalism, including 16 years as national editorial writer for The Oklahoman in the paper’s Washington bureau. Mark also was a reporter, copy editor and sports editor. He earned his journalism degree from the University of Oklahoma and master’s in journalism and public affairs from American University. He and his wife Pamela live in Occoquan, Va., where they enjoy their four grandchildren.
- E15 and Boaters: Still at Risk of Being Left High and Not So Dry
- As Hurricane Florence Approaches
- EPA, Smarter Regulation and Lowering Emissions
- Maintaining Perspective on Electric Vehicles
- New Ad: E15 Push Puts Consumers at Risk
- Yes, Let’s Talk About How Industry is Advancing Cybersecurity