Posted August 5, 2015
Our series highlighting the economic and jobs impact of energy in each of the 50 states continues today with Maryland. We started this week with Florida and Kansas; the series began on June 29 with Virginia. All information covered in this series can be found online here, arranged on an interactive map of the United States. State-specific information across the country will be populated on this map as the series continues.
As we can see with Maryland, the energy impacts of the states individually combine to form energy’s national economic and jobs picture: 9.8 million jobs supported and $1.2 trillion in value added.
The top-line numbers for Maryland: more than 75,000 jobs supported statewide, according to a PwC study issued in 2013; $7 billion added to the state economy; over $4 billion contributed to the state’s labor income.
Page 2 of the document highlights the promising economic opportunities for Marylanders if crude oil exports are allowed. If federal restrictions on U.S. crude exports are lifted Maryland could add more than 4,400 jobs and as much as $530 million dollars to the state economy in 2020.
We’ve now seen reports -- from Columbia University, IHS, ICF, Brookings, the Aspen Institute, the Government Accountability Office, the Congressional Budget Office, the Energy Information Administration (EIA) and others – all pointing to the same conclusions: Blocking trade in crude oil harms consumers, it harms the economy, and it undermines America’s role as a global leader.
Crude oil exports would put downward pressure on U.S. gasoline prices and, if U.S. crude exports are allowed, U.S. weighted average petroleum product prices could decline as much as 2.3 cents per gallon between 2015–2035. The greatest potential annual decline is 3.8 cents per gallon in 2017. These price decreases for gasoline, heating oil and diesel could save American consumers up to $5.8 billion per year, on average, over the 2015–2035 period.
When added up across all of the states that can benefit from exports, nationally, LNG and crude exports could significantly reduce our trade deficit, increase government revenues, grow the economy, and support millions of U.S. jobs in engineering, manufacturing, construction, and facility operations.
Energy is critically important to Maryland, serving as a key engine for the state economy – expanding job opportunities and offering the hope of prosperity to individual Marylanders and their families.
The future benefits of energy for Maryland – and the rest of the country – largely depend on national decisions on the country’s energy path. A new Wood Mackenzie study contrasts the benefits that a set of pro-development policies could have on energy supplies, jobs, the economy and American households with the likely negative effects on energy of regulatory constrained policies. The key comparisons are found on the first page of the linked document.
Energy is essential for all facets of our daily lives, from powering national, state and local economies to powering the family vehicle. Safe, responsible development of domestic oil and natural gas resources is linked to individual prosperity, energy security and basic liberties.
About The Author
Reid Porter is a spokesman for the American Petroleum Institute. Before joining API, he worked as Account Supervisor at Edelman. Porter double majored in English Literature and the Spanish language at Middlebury College in Vermont. He enjoys traveling, cheering for the Green Bay Packers, soccer, rereading Hemingway novels and spending time with family.
- Weighing In on EPA's Wastewater Study
- MOTOR OIL MATTERS: SYNTHETIC OR TRADITIONAL? CHECK YOUR OWNERS MANUAL
- Colorado Leads in Energy, Safety, Environmental Stewardship
- BLM Rule Could Impact Production, Revenues to Governments
- Pennsylvania Energy Needs More Pipelines
- Methane Progress Should Guide Regulatory Approach
- crude oil exports
- gasoline prices
- wood mackenzie
Stay informed: Sign-up for our weekly newsletter