LNG Exports Strengthen U.S. Competitiveness, Help European Allies
Posted November 16, 2016
Two years ago, Jaroslav Neverovič, then Lithuania’s energy minister, told senators at an Energy and Natural Resources Committee hearing that his country and others in Europe were eager to see the United States ramp up exports of liquefied natural gas (LNG), saying that U.S. LNG would bring needed diversity to Europe’s energy supply.
With legislation to streamline and expedite approvals for U.S. LNG export projects pending in Congress, the U.S. ambassadors of Lithuania, the Czech Republic, Estonia, Hungary, Latvia, Poland and Slovakia wrote to congressional leaders this week, urging action. From their letter to House Speaker Paul Ryan (letters also were sent to Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, Senate Minority Leader Harry Reid and House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi):
We are pleased that liquefied natural gas (LNG) from the United States is now being exported from Louisiana and that the first U.S. LNG cargoes have already reached Europe. These exports result in greater liquidity to the global natural gas market and have the potential to provide diversity of sources, suppliers and routes thus to a greater energy security in our part of Europe, a region for long dominated by an external state controlled gas supplier, ready to use energy as a political weapon. U.S. LNG exports will also contribute to reducing vulnerability of the CEE (Central and Eastern European) countries.
The ambassadors point out that the regulatory path remains complex in cases where licenses are sought to export LNG to non-Free Trade Agreement countries. They called legislative action to expedite LNG exports to America’s European allies a “timely and significant issue.”
Indeed, it is. The Cold War left these states with a natural gas pipeline system dominated by the Soviet Union and now Russia, which in the past has used energy as a foreign policy weapon. The CEE countries have invested heavily in infrastructure to remedy the situation, building LNG terminals in Lithuania and Poland to allow LNG deliveries from any direction, including the United States.
The key, though, is development of U.S. export infrastructure. The ambassadors’ letter expresses the hope that bipartisan legislation can be completed in the current session of Congress:
We are convinced that the U.S. LNG exports to CEE would be a game changer for the region. It would send a strong geopolitical signal, enhancing competition on the regional market, while at the same time decreasing dependence on the dominant gas supplier and thus increasing the energy security of the CEE.
We’ve posted a number of times detailing the benefits to the United States of exporting domestic natural gas (most recently here and here). These include bringing overseas wealth into this country via trade, economic growth associated with continued energy development and environmental progress as cleaner-burning natural gas comes into wider use and lowers carbon emissions around the world as has occurred in the U.S.
As the world’s No. 1 producer of oil and natural gas, the United States is well-positioned to be a leader in the global LNG market. Our energy renaissance is producing record volumes of natural gas that can amply supply the domestic market and the needs of friends overseas.
Yet, opportunity in the global market isn’t timeless or limitless. Other nations are working to claim market share, and policies are needed to strengthen U.S. competitiveness. While the U.S. has shipped a few cargos of LNG overseas, 30 applications for approval to export are pending before the U.S. Department of Energy, almost half of which were submitted in 2014 or earlier.
There’s bipartisan support in Congress to act to expedite this process, and the time for Congress to act is now. As the CEE ambassadors’ letter to congressional leaders makes clear, much is at stake.
About The Author
Mark Green joined API after a career in newspaper journalism, including 16 years as national editorial writer for The Oklahoman in the paper’s Washington bureau. Previously, Mark was a reporter, copy editor and sports editor at an assortment of newspapers. He earned his journalism degree from the University of Oklahoma and master’s in journalism and public affairs from American University. He and his wife Pamela have two grown children and five grandchildren.
- Infrastructure: Catalyst for Progress, More Equitable Access to Energy
- Driving the Wrong Direction in California
- Federal Leasing Ban Pledge Hits a Nerve in New Mexico
- The Administration’s Misstep on Eastern Gulf, South Atlantic Offshore Policy
- Ban on New Federal Development Would Risk U.S. Security, Jobs, Environment
- Biden’s Pledge to Pennsylvania Energy Workers Not All It’s Cracked Up to Be
Stay informed: Sign-up for our weekly newsletter