Congressional Democrats Concede Oil Companies Don’t Get Subsidies
Posted February 6, 2013
Yesterday, President Obama called on Congress to pass a “balanced mix of spending cuts and more tax reform” to avoid the sequester spending cuts scheduled to take effect March 1. White House Press Secretary Jay Carney then followed up with, “That means closing loopholes that give tax advantages to the wealthy and to corporations that average Americans and average businesses don't have…So there's the subsidies to oil and gas companies.”
Shortly after the White House press briefing U.S. Rep. Chris Van Hollen of Maryland introduced legislation to replace the current statutory requirement for federal budget cuts with alternative revenue raisers, including a number of tax increases on oil and natural gas companies. Ironically, in doing so he revealed the specious nature of repeated claims that tax provisions used by oil and natural gas companies are “subsidies” for the industry. Let’s have a look at the language, my bolds:
BUDGET PROCESS AMENDMENTS TO REPLACE FISCAL YEAR 2013 SEQUESTRATION
Sec. 301. Limitation on section 199 deduction attributable to oil, natural gas, or primary products thereof.
Sec. 302. Prohibition on using last-in, first-out accounting for major integrated oil companies.
Sec. 303. Modifications of foreign tax credit rules applicable to major integrated oil companies which are dual capacity taxpayers.
In other words, Section 199, the Domestic Production Activities Deduction, designed to promote domestic activity by allowing companies to offset the higher cost of doing business in the U.S. and which is available “to all taxpayers, including individuals, C corporations, farming cooperatives, estates, trusts, and their beneficiaries“ is being taken away – BUT only for oil and natural gas companies.
And in other words, the last-in, first-out (LIFO) inventory method of accounting that has been used for more than 70 years by U.S. taxpayers and is fully recognized and regulated by the IRS is being taken away – BUT only for major integrated oil companies.
And in other words, foreign tax credit rules that are used to allow any, and all, U.S. companies to compete in worldwide markets are being changed – BUT only for major integrated oil companies.
And finally, in other words, when you hear folks describing these items as “subsidies” for oil and natural gas companies that should be removed to ensure fairness in the tax code, realize that they are nothing of the sort, as Rep. Van Hollen’s legislation makes clear. They are cost-recovery and inventory mechanisms available to all U.S. taxpayers – including “average Americans and average businesses.” Mechanisms that some in Washington want to take away for just one targeted industry, in the first case, or just five companies in the last two.
About The Author
Mark Green joined API after a career in newspaper journalism, including 16 years as national editorial writer for The Oklahoman in the paper’s Washington bureau. Previously, Mark was a reporter, copy editor and sports editor at an assortment of newspapers. He earned his journalism degree from the University of Oklahoma and master’s in journalism and public affairs from American University. He and his wife Pamela have two grown children and five grandchildren.
- Environmental Partnership Leadership and Modified Methane Rule
- Natural Gas and the Primacy of Serving Consumers
- The Case for Permanent LWCF Funding – In Pictures and Words
- Bringing NEPA Into 21st Century Will Advance U.S. Infrastructure
- Infrastructure Crossroads: Energy Future Depends on Building Safe, Modern Pipelines
- Study Shows Natural Gas' Vital Role in Reducing Global Emissions
Stay informed: Sign-up for our weekly newsletter