Keystone XL: Safe for Our Country
Posted April 25, 2013
The Keystone XL pipeline is squarely in President Obama’s court. He should approve the full project – for the jobs, economic lift and strengthened energy security this shovel-ready project would provide for our country. (Photo below by Joe Wertz/StateImpact Oklahoma)
There’s no good reason to continue blocking the Keystone XL. Concerns about the environment? Answered. The State Department’s recent review:
The analyses of potential impacts associated with construction and normal operation of the proposed Project suggest that there would be no significant impacts to most resources along the proposed Project route …
Note that State’s favorable environmental assessment includes the pipeline’s operation. It, too, will be safe, as API underscored in its official comments on State’s review:
(Pipeline builder) TransCanada will also follow all requirements of (federal regulations) applicable to facility response plans and safety requirements for hazardous liquids pipelines – plus 57 special conditions for operations and maintenance. As mentioned in the draft (State Department review), the proposed project will be state of the art in materials, coating, construction practices, and monitoring systems. When coupled with the operations and maintenance practices described and the extra 57 special permit conditions that TransCanada has agreed to follow, the pipeline should be one of the safest ever built and operated …
Before reviewing the safety specifics of the Keystone XL itself, some points about pipelines in general:
- The oil and natural gas industry’s goal for pipeline safety is zero spills.
- Over the past 20 years, 99.9992 percent of about 13.5 billion barrels of petroleum liquids transported by pipeline each year is moved safely.
- When you compare three-year averages for 2009-2011 with those of 1999-2001, the number of releases per 1,000 miles of pipeline was down nearly 60 percent.
The U.S. Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA):
Pipelines are one of the safest and most cost-effective means to transport the extraordinary volumes of natural gas and hazardous liquid products that fuel our economy. To move the volume of even a modest pipeline, it would take a constant line of tanker trucks, about 750 per day, loading up and moving out every two minutes, 24 hours a day, seven days a week. The railroad-equivalent of this single pipeline would be a train of seventy-five 2,000-barrel tank rail cars every day.
API President and CEO Jack Gerard on the record of pipeline safety in this country:
“Those are reassuring numbers and reason for each of us, as we consider the benefits of oil and natural gas products – reliable, energy-intensive fuels and countless products that make modern, healthy living possible – to accept the challenge of managing limited risks associated with developing these energy resources.”
A quick rundown of the Keystone XL’s safety features, including the 57 special conditions it has worked out with PHMSA officials:
- Plans to bury the pipeline deeper underground than is required.
- Strong steel pipe will be employed at river crossings.
- Increased frequency of inspections and maintenance updates compared to existing standards.
- 21,000 data sensors along the pipeline’s 1,179-mile route, transmitting information every five seconds so that highly trained pipeline controllers can monitor things in real time.
- More shut-off valves than is typically used, allowing controllers to isolate any section within minutes.
The Keystone XL will deliver about 830,000 barrels of oil per day to America’s Gulf Coast refineries – about 25 percent of that from the U.S. Bakken region and the rest from Canada’s oil sands. Contrary to misinformation spread by oil sands/pipeline opponents, the Canadian crude is not riskier to the pipeline’s integrity than other crudes. API:
The primary focus of pipeline operators is to keep oil in the pipe. … In examining liquid pipeline incident data collected by PHMSA from 2002 through mid-2012, not one release from pipelines moving any Canadian crude was caused by internal corrosion.
The Keystone XL has been delayed long enough. During more than four years of federal review, questions have been raised and answered. The Keystone XL has passed all the tests. API’s Cindy Schild, senior downstream manager for oil sands:
“No pipeline has been analyzed as long and as thoroughly as the Keystone XL pipeline. It’s been under review for more than twice as long as it will take to build the entire project.”
President Obama should approve this safe, environmentally sound energy infrastructure project – for the jobs it would create, the boost it would give to our economy and for the oil that will support that economy as well as our modern way of life.
About The Author
Mark Green joined API after a career in newspaper journalism, including 16 years as national editorial writer for The Oklahoman in the paper’s Washington bureau. Previously, Mark was a reporter, copy editor and sports editor at an assortment of newspapers. He earned his journalism degree from the University of Oklahoma and master’s in journalism and public affairs from American University. He and his wife Pamela have two grown children and five grandchildren.
- Offshore Energy Revenues are Essential to LWCF Conservation
- U.S. Infrastructure Needs Updated Section 401 in Clean Water Act
- We Can Lower Emissions Without a Human Toll and Crushing Economies
- U.S. Pipeline Needs Dealt a Setback by NWP 12 Ruling
- 'Good Energy'
- Let’s Counter the Claims of Oil’s Demise
Stay informed: Sign-up for our weekly newsletter