The Ozone Regulatory Revolving Door
Posted February 3, 2015
Politico reports (subscription required) that the White House Office of Management and Budget on Friday finished review of EPA’s final rule to set state implementation plan requirements for the agency’s 2008 ozone standards.
Here’s the significance of that piece of wonky news: Even before EPA has finished telling the states how to implement the 2008 ozone standards, the agency already is well into setting new, potentially stricter standards. Regulation for regulation sake? It would be hard to find a better illustration.
Indeed, EPA is proposing to tighten the existing ozone standards – not yet fully implemented – from the current 75 parts per billion (ppb) to between 65 and 70 ppb. Yet, that existing standard is bringing ozone levels down, making the air cleaner and healthier – without risking harm to the economy, possibly lowering U.S. GDP by $270 billion per year. EPA’s own data shows that ozone levels have fallen 33 percent since 1980 and 18 percent since 2000:
Yet, EPA charges on toward stricter standards, which are without scientific or public health justifications. In short, there’s no good reason for making the standards more stringent – especially when the existing, effective regulation still is being implemented.
It’s the wrong way to manage public policy. The proposed standards could approach or be lower than naturally occurring ozone levels, thus potentially restricting just about all economic activity. Howard Feldman, API’s director of regulatory and scientific affairs, during a conference call with reporters last week:
“Needless to say, operating under such stringent requirements could stifle new investment. After all, it is precisely new investments that create jobs – the jobs that underpin our economy. … We need policies that make sense. We have many already in place. We need to let them work before adding more.”
About The Author
Mark Green joined API after a career in newspaper journalism, including 16 years as national editorial writer for The Oklahoman in the paper’s Washington bureau. Previously, Mark was a reporter, copy editor and sports editor at an assortment of newspapers. He earned his journalism degree from the University of Oklahoma and master’s in journalism and public affairs from American University. He and his wife Pamela have two grown children and six grandchildren.
- Natural Gas, Climate Progress and the Workforce of the Future
- API 3D Printing Standard is First of Its Kind for Natural Gas and Oil Industry
- Energy Costs, Consumers and Increasing U.S. Production to Help Demand-Supply Mismatch
- Natural Gas and Oil – Today and Tomorrow
- U.S. Must Learn From Europe’s Energy Struggles, Not Repeat Them
- Front Burner: Foes of Natural Gas Focus on Stoves, Furnaces in New Buildings