Letters or Comments
Monday, October 23, 2017
October 23, 2017 - API filed comments with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission on the Department of Energy's notice of proposed rule making on grid reliability and resilience pricing.
Thursday, October 19, 2017
API Comments regarding EPA–HQ– OAR–2017–0091 - Notice of Data Availability Concerning Potential Reductions in the Volume Requirements for 2018 Renewable Fuel and 2019 Biomass-Based diesel under the Renewable Fuels Standard Program.
Friday, September 29, 2017
API filed detailed comments on EPA’s proposal to retain the current National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) for nitrogen oxides. Nitrogen oxides, a precursor to ground-level ozone formation, are generated by many of our industry operations, which have already spent hundreds of millions of dollars to reduce those emissions. API’s comments concurred with the conclusion of the EPA Administrator not to change the standards, arguing that “the current body of scientific evidence and the results of quantitative analyses support the degree of public health protection provided by the current 1-hour and annual primary NO2 standards.” API further stated that, “… the Administrator could consider whether relaxing them would be appropriate.” EPA is expected to finalize the standards, as proposed, in 2018.
Monday, September 25, 2017
API submitted its comments to the BLM on the rescission/revocation of the agency’s 2015 hydraulic fracturing rule. The letter, and the accompanying re-submittal of the 2013 cost study that ARI performed for API, are attached.
Monday, September 11, 2017
As the Pa. House’s ERE committee is scheduled to consider HB 113, that would impose a 3.5 percent natural gas severance tax on top of the impact tax, API-PA sent a letter to the House detailing natural gas industry opposition to the tax that will ultimately raise costs on consumers.
Friday, September 8, 2017
The call was led by API’s President and CEO, Jack Gerard. He was joined by a leading energy expert, Guy Caruso, who’s a senior and national security advisor at the CSIS, Center for Strategic and International Studies, and Bob McNally with the Rapidan Group, a fellow – and also a fellow at the Columbia University Center on Global Energy Policy, and former international and domestic energy advisor in the Bush Administration.
Wednesday, September 6, 2017
In a letter to the EPA Administrator Pruitt, 300 associations strongly urged the EPA to expeditiously reconsider the 2015 ozone standards. Representing many businesses, both large and small, that employ millions of Americans, and local governments in which those businesses thrive, the associations wrote with deep concerns about the harmful impact that the Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) 2015 rule, to make ozone standards the most stringent ever, could have on the economy. The letter adds that EPA’s current regulations are working, air quality continues to improve, and the United States is leading the world in reducing emissions. Therefore, implementation of the new ozone standards could needlessly and significantly damage the economy by imposing unachievable emissions limits and reduction targets on almost every part of our country, including rural and undeveloped areas.
Thursday, August 31, 2017
API provides these comments in addition to comments submitted separately to the docket that were developed jointly with the American Fuel & Petrochemical Manufacturers (AFPM). This separate submittal to the docket contains additional information that reflects views of API and our members on issues that were not addressed in the comments submitted jointly with AFPM.
Monday, August 28, 2017
This letter provides the comments of the American Petroleum Institute (“API”) and the International Association of Geophysical Contractors (“IAGC”) (the “Associations”) in response to the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration’s (“NOAA”) request for public input on actions the National Marine Fisheries Service (“NMFS”) and the National Ocean Service (“NOS”) should take to streamline their regulatory processes and reduce burdens on the regulated community.
Comments in Response to the U.S. Army Corp of Engineers (Corps) Proposed Rule Titled “Use of U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Reservoir Projects for Domestic, Municipal and Industrial Water Supply”
Friday, August 18, 2017
API and the National Association of Home Builders (“NAHB”) submitted joint comments on the Department of the Army, U.S. Army Corp of Engineers (Corps) proposed rule titled “Use of U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Reservoir Projects for Domestic, Municipal and Industrial Water Supply” (“proposed rule”). We support cooperation among the States and the Corps to facilitate water supply uses of Corps’ reservoirs consistent with the authorized purposes of those reservoirs. However, a number of states and water management authorities have noted that the proposed rule was developed without following key stakeholder processes - including sufficient state coordination to avoid interference with state primacy in determining allocation or management of state water. We therefore request that the Corps withdraw this proposed rule, conduct the appropriate stakeholder engagement and resubmit a new proposed rule for public comment prior to finalization.